No. 18-968
Andrew C. Najda v. Nikolaos J. Paterakis
Relisted (2)
Tags: appellate-review due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment manifestly-erroneous meaningful-appeal precedent state-supreme-court
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-06-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a state supreme court denying appellate review to parties that raise an error of law that is manifestly erroneous state supreme court precedent deny them equal protection and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED When a state affords a right of appeal, does a state supreme court denying appellate review, before it, to parties that raise an error of law that is manifestly erroneous state supreme court precedent deny these parties equal protection of the law and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment because they do not receive a meaningful opportunity to be heard on appeal?
Docket Entries
2019-06-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-04-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2018-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 27, 2019)
2018-09-26
Application (18A314) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until November 26, 2018.
2018-09-22
Application (18A314) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 27, 2018 to November 26, 2018, submitted to Justice Breyer.
Attorneys
Andrew Najda, et al.
Andrew C. Najda — Petitioner