No. 18-9684
David Prien-Pinto v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge criminal-law criminal-law-procedure due-process federal-statute mens-rea sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation stolen-firearm
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the commentary at U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1, Application Note 8, which does not require a mens rea to impose the stolen firearm enhancement at U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4), violate the Constitution or Congressional statutes?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the commentary at U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1, Application Note 8, which does not require a mens rea to impose the stolen firearm enhancement at U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4), violate the Constitution or Congressional statutes? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)
Attorneys
David Prien-Pinto
John Palmer Rhodes — Federal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
John Palmer Rhodes — Federal Defenders of Montana, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent