Should 4 habeas petitioners' claims of actual innocence, supported by the facts of the record, be subject to doctrines of abuse or successive use of the writ?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Ql: Should 4 habeas petitienerts claims of actual innocence , supported by thy face of He cat record, be SUbject 4o dodinses af 1 Aloushe or Successive Use of writ 2 Qa: Regardless of procedural bats, does a clear Showing of actual (nnocence. — Warrant’ an evidentiary MAGNA i QS; Shaul procedural bart) eee Keep a man From oloralning post con icon oe wn elidone of Wis IMNOCAN ce TS on NOE face the court acu Does Vsbitioner's showing of actual iMNoLeNCe Serye ag a fadenay . heougn Which Ge have hs Shor wise barred constiduisaal Claims on mucits? (Ons Sehlup slandard apely here 2) Qs | Does He Comet recognize that a cwnsditutional Violactyyn. Protea oly resulted jathe conviction o£ an2 Who ; Luall nnacent 7 (dees Carrier standard apply ? ) 1S aCe 7