No. 18-9691
Dwayne Lee Stallings v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-32-violations criminal-rule false-statement false-statements federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure obstruction-of-justice plain-error plain-error-analysis sentencing sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines sentencing-procedure standard-of-review structural-error
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court's plain error analysis is properly applied to violations of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(1)(A), and, if so, whether such violations are structural.
Whether procuring a false statement to police not under oath which does not in fact significantly impede an investigation is a proper basis for enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court's plain error analysis is properly applied to violations of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(1)(A), and, if so, whether such violations are structural
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Dwayne Stallings
Seth Allen Neyhart — Law Office of Seth A. Neyhart, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent