No. 18-9692
Jody Lanardo White v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure judicial-discretion plain-error preservation-of-error reasonableness-of-sentence sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-reasonableness standard-of-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether challenges to the reasonableness of a sentence must be preserved by specific objection?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1 Whether challenges to the reasonableness of a sentence must be preserved by specific objection?
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-28
Reply of petitioner Jody Lanardo White filed. (Distributed)
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-09-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 9, 2019.
2019-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 9, 2019 to October 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 9, 2019.
2019-07-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 8, 2019 to September 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-09
Response Requested. (Due August 8, 2019)
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Jody Lanardo White
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent