No. 18-9697
Dennis Gordon v. Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 1983-action 28-usc-2254 civil-rights civil-rights-action due-process ex-post-facto federal-court-jurisdiction habeas-corpus ninth-circuit parole parole-hearing parole-release-hearings section-1983 section-2254
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Dennis Gordon's ex post facto challenge to the eight-year increase in the interval between his parole release hearings fall within the Federal Court's habeas corpus jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and associated statutes?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Does Dennis Gordon’s ex post facto challenge to the eight-year increase in the interval between his parole release hearings fall within the Federal Court’s habeas corpus jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and associated statutes? Alternatively, did the Ninth Circuit erroneously refuse to remand his case so that the district court could construe it as a § 1983 action? i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent Jeff Premo to respond filed.
2019-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Dennis Gordon
Jeff Premo
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent