No. 18-9714

John Stephen Routt v. Latanya Howard, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights conditions-of-confinement constitutional-rights disciplinary-segregation due-process eighth-amendment elder-v-holloway pretrial-detention qualified-immunity standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a Defendant entitled to qualified immunity when a Petitioner cites the 'squarely governing' case through a quote of a case with similar facts?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTION 1 Is a Defendant entitled to qualified immunity when a Petitioner cites the “squarely governing’ case through a quote of a case with similar facts? And/or is the rule and procedure of the tenth on qualified immunity, the same or similar to the rule that was struck down in Elder v. Holloway, 510 US 510,514-15, 114 S Ct 1019, 127 L Ed 2d 344 (1994). QUESTION 2 Is a pretrial detainee entitled to due process, at some point, when placed in disciplinary segregation for an alleged rule violation? QUESTION 3 Does a Pretrial detainee have to meet the Eighth Amendment standard when challenging the conditions of confinement? Vow . . All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-03
Waiver of right of respondents Latanya Howard, et al. to respond filed.
2019-06-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2019)

Attorneys

John Stephen Routt
John Stephen Routt — Petitioner
John Stephen Routt — Petitioner
Latanya Howard, et al.
Douglas Allen WilsonAssistant District Attorney, Respondent
Douglas Allen WilsonAssistant District Attorney, Respondent