Whether the District Court erred in committing federal law to the State Burner

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Whether te Disbrt, Coot erred Ib Cometong fennerar fe Fate Butner , U. : for (eSoraton un | behing fo fad Pat fre Courts [ewes yheher he Agpaad Courh erred in foiling “ i "nader jurd schen Boledien Soh honors pre be inforra\ bre ot Mppellewdoo cee i bnefed te righ? appeal becoule Pe: Cormmnt“mem @xcae 4s days , ivelahen oh Me ane sed a 5 hel, ddmmussed an inkerJocishiey UL Court ebisiou in Perce Bilins,, a wiser Lhe sor Pe pe YD¥ICd) far look of Sori avcdzen, and Conphodt wah ‘l cher fife ne ted found Prat 0. Commndreartr or ber 13 appaclable vrneduley le Crak: “ ‘C e sz ‘ Collalerc order décdrire, 1S Wp yy Jam $0 proces betes. once. pe hdreroy sheer Te Courts Lock dabjetgee desperate Ii renin tre te GCL Pobre. wed Commide 0 for he ons 10 dows im Wolanen 4 he Speer na’ to ubvch a Fine fudrer €xcee . AdYyess hd poren fer “ Are pe A coud erred bo dali + . Oppo" ‘ 5 ut. he [usted magna in hd fre oe ene hk febjar Mébhr Torsdehon® sheYhor he Appeals Court Ww