Whether the lower court erred in denying petitioner's request for additional time to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion

No question identified. : OT I I OO SER SWAY SOIT FAL I) DPR FPL OLS Sey ORS ALTUPV WRI Y YY SEVITIUBTY TFL Th ad 7 ae aT nen ee Aen ener A 1 eee ~~ LS3S1Y/Y PAT LIFIIT] FL SOA RITS NGAI ELST VMS LH BORIS STA, PHLIHV BSE S OST BE ONT SPOTL i WITS LINDY FAL LRINIG, TUM HH AVOLS VOLT ; 0 SRC FIONL SNOT ALA ON WLLY AI TONY aI 0 SOMATA Y FH FLAN] NL 2) SAL OR ET SIDE PTT EL VY NIT WO KAY IN TSE] WS FAO ALVA SONI «LOY PHY ORIN FS ONY 5, HENOSTIY WS IMNIL ONT _ RENPOLL OBL TOST ITY ON ALTHO SRL a nn Sn OGG EE eee ~ ‘IBENBSIBG (S)NOLSANE) " a Lisr Oe PARTIES : _. _— a eee eee A the prictions appear in the caption on the tover page. eee Fo Snes eee : ~ — ~ —— _. — ~ — 2 anne ne | Se a eee $e eee eee a wo eee me a . eee aa a ee Late Go Ores: eee Pe : ao 7 J. JueispicroN. | _ ee ¥, feavston =D tle, 3 i Reasons fore Coenen Tire War VT . en GoNcwusieN a ww. Feor OF Sseviee eG -@ |. owe To. Aeon: i. re Appenio1x Al. Deon Desyint Reovest Fee Avorrenae | Co REF OM Stecitic fee Se Tssves.. a a AZ: Cenee. Craccraie Feo SE S: TATUS , Relisvinie ea ie DYino Feo Se Mo rier fan Recon 1oeeATors. __ eee ee ee. BB6a: Oence_Cowsovoarine Course Ap. _— wee Le Le. Ata Se Ate LiCKTION. Foe Lenve“T6 Exc 4 wee Seton Oe Successes S2258~ Merren, Avo. ee Cate Seid. Canlsereb rere, MLLICHTION 5 a re — Asto Denys nie, AltaistianentOr (wree2. ae ee C-|-2: Qege2eDesyint fed Se ffrbicacrion Fels -. r) ee To File Sexond Ob. SievessveP2255 Motion) .. ee ee LT ==) SLIT PO TIT TS NN 2°) cad dee ce ee >; 7 ( a a aac na Sh 7g) 7 ee ORI L EOLE 10 ON yb BOEIZ AT Bee PK A POLITE EL re ye) KEM Pes SEL SSM INI) —K~ SaraIg EIN OT OA FHL) TAL PET Ves Wernrnl A earvig @aran COSY ERE HS SEY SRI RSI? ea TY bb 2S) BS PTF ebb “Sano "A Saeers ORE Cp SQ "K SSTS OFT ETF ib SRR SIE] day SNOT Arenas nana su — Ty TOS SET SER PaRREP Vy DSN CRO ST ST 999 “BQN Raa 8 OB ay S10) os —— __ DL CRY LAs EET SAIS STII] JPR IER SE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI , Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW x For cases from federal courts: The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at