No. 18-9725
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment constitutional-vagueness crime-of-violence criminal-law criminal-law-procedure double-jeopardy due-process evidentiary-rule hobbs-act sentencing sentencing-enhancement vagueness
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
FifthAmendment DueProcess Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the definition of 'crime of violence' in 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 19, 2019)
Attorneys
Jose Munoz
Arnold Jay Levine — Solo Practitioner, Petitioner
Arnold Jay Levine — Solo Practitioner, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent