No. 18-9737
Laquan L. Kellam v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure eighth-amendment eighth-amendment-rights expert-witness-testimony fifth-amendment fifth-amendment-rights fourteenth-amendment fourteenth-amendment-rights fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-rights procedural-error search-and-seizure sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-rights statutory-interpretation warrantless-arrest
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit abuse its discretionary, broadly-based authority of interpretation, thus, violating petitioner's Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment right(s), by incorrectly mis-interpreting United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976 - contrary to U.S. Supreme Court intention?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : . "
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent