No. 18-9747

Glenn Damond v. Louisiana

Lower Court: Louisiana
Docketed: 2019-06-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bills-of-credit civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process extortion financial-instrument fraud fraud-on-court judicial-function judicial-misconduct natural-rights plea-agreement trespassing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it constitutional for the trial court to disguise an investment instrument into a criminal plea agreement, use it to extort the rights of an american, by creating a financial security that's worth 52 million dollars, thus a private corporation creating bills of credit after Petitioner signed it?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is it constitutional for the trial court to disguise an investment instrument into a criminal plea agreement, use it to extort the rights of an american, by creating a financial security that’s worth 52 million dollars, thus a private corporation creating bills of credit after Petitioner signed it? 2. Does destroying a litigant paperwork, misleading on court dates, and having private meetings without petitioner knowing nor being present prejudice him, his process to gain life and liberty, thus violating a constitutional, secured right, which is due process of law which is established by this court in Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385, 394, 34 S. Ct. 779, 783, 58 L. Ed. 1363 (1914)? 3. Is it a judicial Function for a Judge to destroy claimant’s documents, commit constructive fraud, Fraud and Fraud on the court and does fraud vitiates this entire proceedings according to this courts ruling in Nudd v burrows 1875 91 U.S. 416; cf, Boyce’s Executors v. Grundy 183028 U.S. 210, and United States v. Throckmorton 187898 U.S. 61? 4. Does trespassing Claimant’s natural rights vacates the courts . proceeding against him, especially when the claimant is a signator on the Declaration of Independence? _ In the Supreme Court for the united states for america TERM, 2019 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner :Glenn-Damond, respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINION BELOW The ruling of the Louisiana Supreme Court and fourth Circuit court of appeals appears at

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Glenn Damond
Glenn Damond — Petitioner
Glenn Damond — Petitioner
Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker MurrillOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Elizabeth Baker MurrillOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent