Shanta G. Phillips-Berry v. Patricia Blackwell Scurlock, et al.
SocialSecurity
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims without a trial or hearing, in violation of the petitioner's civil rights and due process protections under the Constitution
No question identified. : CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned Pro Se Litigant counsel of record for Appellant DEFENDANT/APPELLEE: Patricia Blackwell Scurlock 14136 W. Hoffman Rd. Hammond, Louisiana 70454 Attorney For: Patricia Blackwell Scurlock Raspanti Law Firm, LLC 3900 N. Causeway Blvd. Lakeway One, Ste. 1470 Metairie, Louisiana 70002 Joseph Albe, Attorney 3300 Canal Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70119 Robert Lenter, Attorney 716 North Causeway Blvd. Metairie, Louisiana 70001 Thaddeus L. Teaford, Doctor 1514 Jefferson Highway New Orleans, Louisiana 70121 Mahmoud M. Sarmini, Doctor 1514 Jefferson Highway New Orleans, Louisiana 70121 The following listed persons and entities as described in the (5™ CIR. R. 28.2.1) have an interest in the outcome of this case. i Ochsner HealthCare System 1415 Jefferson Highway New Orleans, Louisiana 70121 , East Jefferson HealthCare System 4200 Houma Blvd. Metairie, Louisiana 70006 Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company 200 St. Charles Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 Uncle Bob’s Storage 6467 Maine Street Buffalo, New York 14221 Hollywood Productions 106 Hollywood Drive Gaffney, SC 29341 Facebook Hackerway Menlo Park, CA. 94025 Uber 1455 Market Street Ste. 400 4" Floor . San Francisco, CA 94103 Lyft, L.L.C. 185 Berry Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Enterprise Leasing Company 600 Corporate Park Drive St. Louis, MO 63105 Housing Authority Louisiana 2415 Quail Drive Baton Rouge, La 70806 ii Office of Motor Vehicle Louisiana 7701 Independence Blvd. Baton Rouge, La 70806 Department of Family Service Louisiana 627 North 4" Street Baton Rouge, La 70802 Social Security Office of Louisiana 5455 Bankers Ave. Baton Rouge, La 70808 Department of Transportation 1201 Capitol Access Rd. Baton Rouge, La 70802 ‘United States Military 101 Amy Pentagon Washington, DC 20310-0101 Appellant Shanta G. Phillips-Berry 202 Clemson Street Kenner, Louisiana (504) 635-8239 /s/ Shanta G. Phillips-Berry Pro Se Litigant of Record for Appellant iii PRESENTED ARGUMENTS 1. Appellant argued that by not being able to receive a fair trial jury’s verdict, court date or sentence date, appellant was imprisoned without a sentencing with cruel and usual punishment. Which this country’s justice system rules unwarranted and is called kidnapping which violates individuals’ civil rights which is also stated in this constitution. Anyone that prevents any citizen(s) from movement throughout this country restraining, holding or stopping them in any form is a crime. This person should be treated as any criminal kidnapping and breaking laws. This technical implant leads appellant to think about anyone married to a military spouse which has been place in this situation using military medical benefit. Unfortunately, appellant wasn’t using the benefits they were being stolen, and used for fraudulent insurance claims by Appellee(s). 2. Appellant also argues the fact about this reformed justice system using implants to control human life is a violation of this constitution as well. This country has grown in technology in many areas that will help people all across this country; but to use something that was created to help disabled individuals unable to communicate is inhuman and goes above levels of humanity. Technology creates robs to do job removing humans from work and now this country is trying to make the human popularity robs which v : offends GOD and any other spiritual community. This device is being place in humans all across this country is a deceptive device is and opens doors to criminal to easily access banking, private and personal. Nothing and No one is safe now. These high ranking professionals and wealthy citizens exposed low income, poverty stridden citizens to racial and hateful acts of crimes, creating a conspiracy to easily mislead and enforce corruption within the justice system. 3. With the use of government departments, transportation departments, private own companies, the communication department, internet