No. 18-9760
Andrew D. Dixon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: acca acca-sentence-enhancement acca-statute armed-career-criminal-act criminal-procedure elements-clause johnson-precedent post-johnson precedent predicate-prior residual-clause sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the court error denying claims that the residual clause didn't apply to defendant by using Post-Johnson precedent claims and raising elements clause accusations that were not raised at court?
Did the court err affirming/denying claim of 2 predicate priors that do not qualify for the ACCA sentence enhancement?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court error denying claims that the residual clause didn't apply to defendant by using Post-Johnson precedent claims and raising elements clause accusations that were not raised at court?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-12
Supplemental brief of petitioner Andrew D. Dixon filed. (Distributed)
2019-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Andrew D. Dixon
Andrew D. Dixon — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent