No. 18-9760
Andrew D. Dixon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: acca acca-sentence-enhancement acca-statute armed-career-criminal-act criminal-procedure elements-clause johnson-precedent post-johnson precedent predicate-prior residual-clause sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court error denying claims that the residual clause didn't apply to defendant by using Post-Johnson precedent claims and raising elements clause accusations that were not raised at court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Question(s) Ground (2): Did the court error denying claims that the residual clause didn't apply to defendant by using Post-Johnson precedent claims and raising elements clause accusations that were not raised at court? Ground (1): . Did the court err affirming/denying claim of 2 predicate priors that do not qualify for the ACCA sentence enhancement? ;
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-12
Supplemental brief of petitioner Andrew D. Dixon filed. (Distributed)
2019-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent