No. 18-9762
Kwame A. Insaidoo v. United States
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-666 5th-amendment 6th-amendment circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-prosecution due-process federal-benefit jury-determination jury-trial second-circuit statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Trademark
DueProcess Trademark
Latest Conference:
2019-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred, in violation of U.S. Const. V and VI, when it held that the government need not prove to a jury the federal benefit element in a prosecution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 666?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred, in violation of U.S. Const. V and VI, when it held that the government need not prove to a jury the federal benefit element in a prosecution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 666? il
Docket Entries
2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-11-06
Reply of petitioner Kwame Insaidoo filed.
2019-10-23
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-09-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 23, 2019.
2019-09-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 23, 2019 to October 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 23, 2019 to September 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 23, 2019.
2019-07-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 23, 2019.
2019-07-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 24, 2019 to August 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2019)
Attorneys
Kwame Insaidoo
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
Michelle Barth — Law Office of Michelle Anderson Barth, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent