No. 18-9777

Earnest S. Harris v. E. McCumsey, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-25
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction standing
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did respondent E. M'Cummsey, Senior Law Librarian at SMU, deny petitioner Earnest S. Ware access to the court?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did cesponeent E., M°Cummsey/ Senior Law Library ot . 9 elicand Ray SMU, cleny PeLdioner Earnest S.! Ware Access Yo ve Court

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-25
Waiver of right of respondents E. McCumsey, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 25, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

E. McCumsey, et al.
Michelle Devorah Igra — California Department of Justice - Office of the A, Respondent
Earnest S. Harris
Earnest S. Harris — Petitioner