Whether the lower court(s) erred in concluding that petitioner did not suffer ineffective assistance of counsel

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : . (1). Whether The Lower Court(s) Erred In Concluding That Petitioner Did Not Suffer Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel At His Resentencing And On Appeal .Of His Resentencing: . (a). In Light Of Shepard?; and . (b). Whether A Sentence Which Exceeds The : Statutory Maximum, Is Harmless Error? . (2). Whether’ The Lower Court(s) Erred In Concluding ' That Petitioner's Instant And Predicate : . Offense(s) Qualify As A Crime Of Violence , For Purposes Of . U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2? . (3). Whether The Lower Court(s) Erred In Concluding That: ; (a). Even Applying Johnson To § 924(c), : Petitioner's Conviction would Still Stand?; ; (b). The Language In 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (3) (B), Similar To ACCA's Residual Clause, Is Not . Void For Vagueness In Light Of Johnson? (4). Whether The Lower Court(s) Erred In Concluding That Petitioner Failed To Make A Substantial Showing Of The Denial Of A Constitutional Right? : : ‘These Questions Are Collectively Addressed Respecting The Arguments Petitioner Makes Herein. . i : : . No:IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI