Whether the petitioner's due process and equal protection rights were violated when the state court dismissed his criminal case despite evidence of self-defense and prosecutorial misconduct

No question identified. : —_—_—__erww 7 , (Rule WH) Questions teesented Sor Review) Rure al (8) 1 Woaune A. tu ss aoe . ADs PR IOONA , , PHND Cotorado Bud a Then Sus oS, SASSO . OD fsandc k Basar) _ottieer's (best tan) Rererded Coady stssing UND) “Thess. ; | Rages TKT_Odes) Mush Daveid Asdurted Ban And Daven) Acaursed / | bres vols Cana) weagodie (| Then AT Count On, CAsqust STANT) . SC Sandna) Testitied Ad Saids Werbushand aose) AsaurTed Wor Awd Wenee). -— | Asturian Mas wl ma fis weapedyy : Bu Fis (ES oss slvasged 0's “wrictanapanes Asati Gon Sasadiyh ya . _ 4 Yes) “Woe Selena AstacX wT wean oT Disselesedg ; Tadsey Reynolds (Rasoked wae om The “buidence’ Ta a Riders: Cee 7 _| Then, Gury Trobetiow=WolaSions CWismisseQ . aren a . ; v i , OK Wis: Tatenden5 Dieoke bbe Rekissl! le ase Cg Leama) CLoowesy Rensowabs “od Cages 5 Xs, TS watehed “eS Satine Rost wide, AGG) SewewaAL Kimes Ard _ e_ Dowt Agase, ws Sela Asaurd On A odmeen, Roy Cres) —— —Xo_A Lesser eorcge, o5_uni <Taameauet Sane Assoktis