No. 18-9791
Luis David Moreno-Pena v. United States
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion leniency preservation-of-error sentencing-argument sentencing-reasonableness sentencing-review
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-11-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether challenges to the reasonableness of a sentence rooted in a court's failure to address arguments for leniency must be preserved by specific objection?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1 Whether challenges to the reasonableness of a sentence rooted in a court’s failure to address arguments for leniency must be preserved by specific objection?
Docket Entries
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-09-30
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-08-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 30, 2019.
2019-08-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 29, 2019 to September 30, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-30
Response Requested. (Due August 29, 2019)
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Luis David Moreno-Pena
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent