No. 18-9793
Timothy Dale Gould v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-924c categorical-approach criminal-law divisibility statutory-interpretation violent-crime
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-11-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) divisible for purposes of categorical analysis?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Is 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) is divisible for purposes of categorical analysis? i
Docket Entries
2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-18
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-09-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 18, 2019.
2019-09-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2019 to October 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 20, 2019.
2019-08-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 21, 2019 to September 20, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-07-22
Response Requested. (Due August 21, 2019)
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Timothy Dale Gould
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent