Whether the District Court's decisions based upon estoppel to dismiss petitioner's civil lawsuit against the State of Maryland violate the Constitution

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the District Court’s decisions based Upon Estoppel to Dismiss Petitioner’s civil lawsuit against the State of Maryland violate the Constitution. 2. Whether the Fourth Circuit Court and District Court’s Reliance Upon Estoppel to Dismiss Petitioner’s Federal lawsuit against the State of Maryland in light of his request for Injunctive Relief and Relief for Declaratory Judgment violate the Fourteenth Amendment. 3. Whether petitioner’s admissible evidence proofing fraud, collusion, deception and conflict of interest in light of prolong State court’s proceedings tainted with preconceived outcomes which selectively targeted petitioner's interests repeatedly by design to deny him substantive justice conspicuously and arbitrary oppress and repress his rights without due process of law vitiates res judicata, estoppel or Rooker-Feldman doctrines. 4. Does fraud vitiates every judicial proceedings, if so, did the Fourth Circuit Court’s decision affirming the district court’s reasons based on preclusion, deprives petitioner of his due process and equal protection rights before the law in light of the numerous admissible evidences on [Federal Courts’] file in support of his independent claim which proof the state court’s proceedings reflects a pattern tainted with frauds, collusions, deceptions, conflict of interest and . discrimination? ii "=