No. 18-9804
Michael Zachariah Gomez v. United States
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts federal-revocation plain-unreasonableness sentencing sentencing-review standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the standard of review in appeals of federal revocation sentences is limited to review for \'plain unreasonableness\'?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the standard of review in appeals of federal revocation sentences is limited to review for “plain unreasonableness”? ii PARTIES Michele Zachariah Gomez is the petitioner; he was the defendant-appellant below. The United States of America is the respondent; it was the plaintiff-appellee below. iii
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2018-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael Zachariah Gomez
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent