Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief on his claim that 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague and his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was obtained in violation of due-process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Questions Presented 1. Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief on his claim that 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague and his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was obtained in violation of due process. 2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred under Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003) and Buck v. Davis, 137 8. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017), by denying Petitioner a certificate of appealability based on adverse circuit precedent, when the issue was nonetheless being debated among jurists around the country -and has since been resolved in Petitioner’s favor. i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no