No. 18-9810

Erik Ward v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-06-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: attempted-murder civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions lesser-included-offense physical-evidence premeditation standard-of-proof sufficiency-of-evidence trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether trial counsel failed to provide effective assistance of counsel by not properly performing procedural and due process requirements, and not informing the petitioner of the potential for a lesser included offense

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | L Lanthe court please reEViaw that Trial Counsel Fotled made Wore performante #0 Perkori protedure auc ove prove ss, Base pen jury ekecd Knowle olge oF the importance of “Entent’ Pero / Lode. & lobo /18) toy, 2.My trial Counsel Failed to iFkorna ne. o Ayear ole_’D_| would he For Att enpreol murder with Our Nt IFul, detberate, anol pe ewie.cll+xteof MuUrole ~ Fan the Court PIAS TREE thHiS wintter Into Cons (eration hose, Upon the preponderance. OF the evidence, to Latent” 4. Lanthe Court please review and decide +o reduce the. Charges to DFTEMpPt ol murder thot Brisan? punishable by 5,7, o Tyeors in State Can the Courts please review the Inck. of Physical eviclence tn this Case to Convict 7 petitioner For attempted wiurder Willful deliberate, anol premecitote.cl.

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Erik Ward
Erik Ward — Petitioner