Whether petitioner was denied his Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights

Questions presented: . . . 1)WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS RIGHT'S SECURED BY . . . Wes UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AND DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW, BY THE AGENT'S FALSE FACT TESTIMONY, REPORT'S, THAT ARE ALSO IN VIOLATION OF DEA/POLICE POLICY, AND PROCEDURE? 2)AFTER PETITIONER REFUSED TO GO MEET INFORMANT AT THE PRE-ARRANGED AMOCO FILLING STATION LOCATION ON JANUARY 3rd, 2001-DID PETITIONER WITHDRAW FROM THE CHARGED OFFENSE OF CONSPIRACY WITH HIM?, ; AND DID THE AGENT'S THEREAFTER COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT'S WITH FABRICATED FACT'S? ‘3 WHEN DOES A COOPERATING DEFENDANT/INFORMANT COUNT AS A CO-CONSPIRATOR IN ANY CASE, OR COUNTING AS-A CO-CONSPIRATOR IN ANY CASE, AND WAS THERE BIAS, AND CONFLICT'S OF INTERESTS THAT ~~ PREVENTED PROPER ASSESSMENT OF FACT'S? ; : : 4)DID THE AGENT'S OMIT FACTS AND EVIDENCE, THEN LUMP-UP MULTIPLE CONSPIRACIES AS ONE-TO FALSELY CHARGE . . PETITIONER DJENASEVIC WITHOUT SPECIFIC PROOF OF CONSPIRACY. AND DID THE COURT FAIL TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE IN CONTRAVENTION OF RULE 201(d)? ,