Whether the district court's sentencing methodology was procedurally and substantively sound and that the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing the sentence it did

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Il WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT’S SENTENCING METHODOLOGY WAS PROCEDURALLY AND SUBSTANTIVELY SOUND AND THAT THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION BY IMPOSING THE SENTENCE IT DID. Il. WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS FAILED TO FOLLOW DECISIONS MADE BY THIS UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT REGARDING CRIMINAL SENTENCING. ‘Ill, WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED PROCEDURALLY AND SUBSTANTIVELY BY IMPOSING AN EXCESSIVE SENTENCE TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION PETITIONER’S ARRESTS THAT DID NOT RESULT IN CONVICTIONS.