Is petitioner entitled to relief where his constitutional rights are/were violated by receiving ineffective assistance of counsel at the trial court level?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED © Ts petitioner enticed to relieL where Ws consi tonal rlaits are [were viclated bi recelvina, Tueflectve Assiation of couse | ot the trial ceasteth level = Prosecurhion /t Lowes~ Cows SON, “Ao”! Pebtonar says “Yes” @ Is petit towesenistied te ceire® cuore his constrftutteval rants are/were Utelated by Prosec ure, erase XN icahy trapprapriate camduct COUSIN PST TN — Sastatw extreme prejudtea ot & \ coum level < Prosecution /, tower Cows SOY "Ale "' Petite nai Zags "Yes! @® Ts pehHouewr evtitled to relief where his congttettencd rights ave /Wwere Vtalated Usher Ha tral coum judge albusal his ctecreticon NW cdectsteons dun tral allawine — pedthteuesfo foe Tmiputed) Ow dowaci ns, Sree of . Prejudice 7 fia! Prosecution v, Louse Cou t5 oY Neo ; a wt FetiHoner Says Yos