No. 18-9824

Steven G. Patten v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-06-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection flight-instruction fourteenth-amendment harmless-error jury-selection peremptory-challenges racial-discrimination self-defense
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner can establish a prima facie case of discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether Petitioner can establish a prima facie case of discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when the prosecutuion in a state criminal trial used peremptories (i.e. peremptory challenges) to remove the only African-American (i.e. Black) jurors from the #&fillé venire (2 Black jurors in a venire totalling 35), where the §fi@f jurors' : answers do not necessarily dispel any inference of discrimination (especially since the answers did not give rise to dismissal for cause). 2. Whether the trial court's failure to give a self-defense instruction (with respect to the animal crueliy charge) is harmless error, where the jury was instructed that Petitioner (& not the prosecution) had to prove he was not in danger? : 3. Whether an erroneous & misleading flight instruction can bae cured by the standard instruction under CALCRIM No. 200 (that some instructions may not apply)? -|" wy ‘cee

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Steven G. Patten
Steven Patten — Petitioner
Steven Patten — Petitioner