Carlos Alberto Ochoa-Orozco v. United States
DueProcess
Whether the district court violated Appellant's right to due process and his Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) 1. Whether the district court violated Appellant's right to due process, and his Sixth Amendment right to:afair trial, where’ the district court 'lacked' venue pursuant to Rule 18, Fed. R. Crim. P. 2. Whether pursuant to the Sixth Amendment, it is a violation of Appellant's right to a fair trial, where the Assistant U.S. Attorney threatens the defendant, by assuring him that [iJf he takes the . witness stand in his own defense, he'll make sure that he receives : a life sentence. 3. Whether Appellant must be resentenced where the District Court, sentenced him in accordance with the charges contained in the indictment, but Appellant plead to a different charge, contained in the Plea Agreement. 4. Where there is an obvious Apprendi/Blakely error, must Appellawt _ be resentenced. 5. Whether Appellant must. be resentenced where counsel was so ineffective at [both] the trial-level, and Appellate level, that his representation amounted to (no representation.) 6. Whether Appellant must be retried where the cumulative effect of “numerous” Constitutional errors; Procedural errors; Due Process . . QUESTION(S) PRESENTED exeoes rendered the proceedings inherently unfair. 7. Where the rulings of the District Court, and the Appellate €ourts' are in conflict with this courté(the Supreme:‘Gourt) in relation to their holdings to this particular case ? oo i-B