No. 18-9836
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: allen-charge coercion coercive-instruction criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process judicial-discretion jury-deliberation jury-deliberations mistrial verdict-review
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred or abused its discretion in reversing or rescinding its grant of mistrial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Whether the district court erred or abused its discretion 1n reversing or rescinding its grant of mistrial below. 2. The second question presented is: Whether the district court's second Allen charge was improper or coercive, necessitating a vacating of the verdict below. i
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Dwight Brown
Seth Allen Neyhart — Law Office of Seth A. Neyhart, Petitioner
Seth Allen Neyhart — Law Office of Seth A. Neyhart, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent