No. 18-9839

Robert E. King v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2019-06-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeal-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel equal-protection ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel juvenile-justice post-conviction-relief racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did Oklahoma's Appellate Court deprive Robert E. King the right to equal protection

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Did Oklahoma’s Appellate Court “The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals” deprive Robert E. King the right to equal protection of the law afforded to all citizens of the United States? Was King’s conviction on February 9, 1973 a violation of United Kent v. United States and Title 10 O.S. § 7303.5-1 et. Seq., and Title 10 O.S. 7303-4.3 et. Seq., towards an improper certification of juvenile as an adult? Was Mr. King, who was seventeen (17) years old at the time deprived of his rights to effective assistance of counsel at the entry of plea agreement? Has Robert E. King been deprived of his Constitutional Rights as a black male in the southern State of Oklahoma? Does Robert E. King have a right to appeal violations of Statutory and Constitutional laws at any time?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Robert King
Robert E. King — Petitioner
Robert E. King — Petitioner