No. 18-9846
Bradford Metcalf v. S. Kallis, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus miscarriage-of-justice wrongful-conviction
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must the Petitioner who is actually innocent be given the same constitutional consideration as citizens who succeeded him?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED — : To avoid a further MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, must the Petitioner, who is ACTUALLY INNOCENT of the charges against him, be given the . same constitutional consideration as citizens who succeeded him?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-10
Waiver of right of respondent S. Kallis, Warden to respond filed.
2019-06-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)
Attorneys
S. Kallis, Warden
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent