Whether US Supreme Court justices may refuse to enforce FRCP rules and precedent

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (1) Congress delegated the US Supreme Court justices the discretion to choose the petition for certiorari cases they will grant and Congress has directed that the US Supreme Court justices create, adhere, and enforce the FRCP rules of law that the US Supreme Court and its lower courts are to adhere to. When US Supreme Court justices’ supervisory power is called upon to enforce the US Supreme Court rules of law and U.S. Supreme Court precedent, may the US Supreme Court justices refuse to oversee and refuse to enforce the US Supreme Court FRCP rules and law and refuse to enforce the U.S. Supreme Court precedent? (2) When a Congressman contrives through fraudulent misrepresentations of the facts of the case, to not allow Congress to exercise its inherent oversight over federal agencies and federal judicial misconduct, will the US Supreme Court exercise its supervisory power and its power of checks and balances? (3) Whether an action for relief from judgment procured by judicial fraud on the court may be summarily dismissed and summarily upheld, without review of the fraud on the court allegations — the very allegations on which relief : could be granted and the fraudulently procured judgment set aside? . | | . | | ii (The fraudulently procured judgment upheld the removal of a property : right without due process. All the Courts, have refused an evidentiary hearing through summary dismissals and summary affirmances without review of the fraud on the court allegation, violating U.S. Supreme Court precedent; Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire, 322 U.S. 250-51 and U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61)(requiring an : evidentiary hearing for actions for relief from judgment for fraud on the court.)The courts also ignored the holding in United States v. Alex, 816010, (summary affirmance is prohibited in cases where an evidentiary hearing has been denied.)) | \ | . [_ iii PARTIES TO THE ACTION Petitioner in ProSe: ROBERT J, JAFFE, : Respondent: U.S. Congressman, BRAD SHERMAN. — | iv