No. 19-1006

Facebook, Inc., et al. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2020-02-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: communication-contents constitutional-rights constitutional-subpoena contempt criminal-defendant-rights privacy privacy-protection service-provider-disclosure service-providers stored-communications-act subpoena
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to subpoena service providers and force them to turn over the contents of their account holders' communications, notwithstanding the SCA's express prohibition on such disclosures; and whether a service provider can be held in contempt for refusing to violate the SCA in response to such a subpoena

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Under the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”), covered service providers “shall not knowingly divulge to any person or entity the contents” of their account holders’ communications, absent an applicable exception. 18 U.S.C. § 2702(a). The question presented is: Whether a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to subpoena service providers and force them to turn over the contents of their account holders’ communications, notwithstanding the SCA’s express prohibition on such disclosures; and whether a service provider can be held in contempt for refusing to violate the SCA in response to such a subpoena.

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-27
Reply of petitioners Facebook, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-09
Brief of respondents Lee Sullivan in opposition filed.
2020-02-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 13, 2020.
2020-02-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 12, 2020 to April 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 12, 2020)
2019-12-02
Application (19A609) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 8, 2020.
2019-11-26
Application (19A609) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 10, 2019 to February 8, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Facebook, Inc., et al.
Joshua Seth LipshutzGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Joshua Seth LipshutzGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Lee Sullivan
Stuart BannerUCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic, Respondent
Stuart BannerUCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic, Respondent