No. 19-1021
Micah Jessop, et al. v. City of Fresno, California, et al.
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights fourth-amendment law-enforcement police-misconduct property-rights property-seizure qualified-immunity search-and-seizure search-warrant seizure
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FourthAmendment DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw FourthAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it is clearly established that the Fourth Amendment prohibits police officers from stealing property listed in a search warrant
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether it is clearly established that the Fourth Amendment prohibits police officers from stealing property listed in a search warrant. (i)
Docket Entries
2020-08-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-07-09
DISTRIBUTED.
2020-06-11
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-18
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by DKT Liberty Project, et al. GRANTED.
2020-05-18
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Constitutional Accountability Center GRANTED.
2020-05-18
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers GRANTED.
2020-05-18
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by New Civil Liberties Alliance GRANTED.
2020-05-18
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Cato Institute, et al. GRANTED.
2020-05-18
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Institute for Justice GRANTED.
2020-04-28
Reply of petitioners Micah Jessop, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-13
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Constitutional Accountability Center.
2020-04-13
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
2020-04-10
Brief of respondents City of Fresno, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-03-19
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by DKT Liberty Project, et al.
2020-03-17
Response to motion of New Civil Liberties Alliance for leave to file as amicus curiae from respondent City of Fresno, et al. filed.
2020-03-17
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Institute for Justice.
2020-03-12
Response Requested. (Due April 13, 2020)
2020-03-11
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by New Civil Liberties Alliance.
2020-03-09
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Cato Institute, et al. (Distributed)
2020-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent City of Fresno, et al. to respond filed.
2020-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 19, 2020)
2019-12-02
Application (19A604) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 14, 2020.
2019-11-26
Application (19A604) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 15, 2020 to February 14, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Cato Institute and Americans for Prosperity Foundation
Jay Remington Schweikert — The Cato Institute, Amicus
Jay Remington Schweikert — The Cato Institute, Amicus
City of Fresno, et al.
Daniel P. Barer — Pollak, Vida and Barer, Respondent
Daniel P. Barer — Pollak, Vida and Barer, Respondent
Constitutional Accountability Center
DKT Liberty Project, Reason Foundation, Individual Rights Foundation, Law Enforcement Action Partnership, Restore the Fourth, Inc.
Jessica Ring Amunson — Jenner & Block LLP, Amicus
Jessica Ring Amunson — Jenner & Block LLP, Amicus
Institute for Justice
Patrick Michael Jaicomo — Institute for Justice, Amicus
Patrick Michael Jaicomo — Institute for Justice, Amicus
Micah Jessop, et al.
Neal Kumar Katyal — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Neal Kumar Katyal — Hogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Donald Manwell Falk — Mayer Brown LLP, Amicus
Donald Manwell Falk — Mayer Brown LLP, Amicus
New Civil Liberties Alliance