Did the Minnesota District Court's division of petitioner's military retired pay violate the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Minnesota District Court’s division of petitioner’s military retired pay violate the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act? 2. Did the Minnesota District Court’s failure to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding the parties’ disputes over the enforceability of the Court’s April 2, 2008 Order with respect to the dollar value of the divisible portion of her military retired pay violate her due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment?