No. 19-1035

ShaRon D. Rose v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 11-usc-362 automatic-stay bankruptcy-code bankruptcy-code-362-a bankruptcy-estate bankruptcy-filing bankruptcy-petition bankruptcy-petition-dismissal bankruptcy-statute-2005-revisions bankruptcy-stay debtor-property repeat-bankruptcy-filings statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-06-25 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(8)(A) terminates the automatic bankruptcy stay as to property of the bankruptcy estate

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED When a debtor files for bankruptcy for the first time, Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code imposes an automatic stay that prevents creditors from reaching assets of the debtor, the debtor’s non-estate property, and the property of the bankruptcy estate. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). The bankruptcy estate typically contains the vast majority of a debtor’s assets. In 2005, Congress revised the bankruptcy statute to deter repeat bankruptcy filings. A key component of those revisions presumptively terminates the automatic stay “with respect to the debtor” 30 days after a bankruptcy petition is filed if the petitioner had a prior petition pending within the preceding year that was dismissed. 11 U.S.C. § 362(¢)(8)(A) The question presented is: Whether 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(8)(A) terminates the automatic bankruptcy stay as to property of the bankruptcy estate. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS 1. Rose v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc., No. 1950598 (5th Cir.) (judgment entered Dec. 10, 2019; mandate issued Jan. 2, 2020). 2. Rose v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc., No. 18-ev491-LY (W.D. Tex.) (magistrate recommendation issued Apr. 29, 2019; judgment entered June 11, 2019).

Docket Entries

2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-08
Reply of petitioner ShaRon D. Rose filed. (Distributed)
2020-06-04
Brief of respondents Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2020-05-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 4, 2020.
2020-05-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2020 to June 4, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-04-20
Response Requested. (Due May 20, 2020)
2020-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.
2020-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 23, 2020)
2020-01-03
Application (19A741) denied by Justice Alito.
2019-12-31
Application (19A741) for a stay, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Brian Timothy BurgessGoodwin Procter, LLP, Respondent
Brian Timothy BurgessGoodwin Procter, LLP, Respondent
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al.
Michael D. ConnerHirsch & Westheimer, Respondent
Michael D. ConnerHirsch & Westheimer, Respondent
ShaRon D. Rose
Ishan Kharshedji BhabhaJenner and Block LLP, Petitioner
Ishan Kharshedji BhabhaJenner and Block LLP, Petitioner