No. 19-1041

Rostislav Khrapko v. Kristin Splain, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights declaratory-relief due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction government-corruption interlocutory-appeal standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-05-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether discrimination with no legitimate rationale, motivated by government corruption violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ssi 1. Whether discrimination with no legitimate rationale, motivated by government corruption violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United . States Constitution? . 2. Whether factually suggested allegations of government corruption, Due Process, and Equal Protection violations may be dismissed pursuant to domestic relations exception to federal jurisdiction? 8. Whether the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal from the District Court Order which refused or denied declaratory relief and injunction against allegedly corrupt Decisions and Orders issued by referee Splain?

Docket Entries

2020-05-04
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-04-06
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-21
Waiver of right of respondent Kristin Splain to respond filed.
2020-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Kristin Splain
Frederick Arthur BrodieNew York State Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Frederick Arthur BrodieNew York State Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Rostislav Khrapko
Rostislav Khrapko — Petitioner
Rostislav Khrapko — Petitioner