No. 19-1070
Jeffrey Alan Olson v. Pennsylvania
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 4th-amendment Birchfield-v-North-Dakota blood-draw constitutional-rights criminal-penalties criminal-procedure due-process retroactivity substantive-law supreme-court-precedent warrantless-blood-draw warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court's holding that states may not impose criminal penalties on the refusal to submit to a warrantless blood draw, Birchfield v. North Dakota, 136 S. Ct. 2160, 2185 (2016), is substantive and therefore applies retroactively
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court’s holding that states may not “mpose criminal penalties on the refusal to submit to” a warrantless blood draw, Birchfield v. North Dakota, 136 S. Ct. 2160, 2185 (2016), is substantive and therefore applies retroactively. (i)
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-20
Reply of petitioner Jeffrey Olson filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-01
Brief of respondent Pennsylvania in opposition filed.
2020-04-06
Response Requested. (Due May 6, 2020)
2020-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-16
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2020-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 30, 2020)
2020-01-21
Application (19A807) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 28, 2020.
2020-01-16
Application (19A807) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 29, 2020 to February 28, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Jeffrey Olson
David Thomas Leake — Law Office of David T. Leake, Petitioner
Pennsylvania
Hugh J. Burns Jr. — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent