Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether communications with an adult intermediary to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor are punishable only if the defendant's interaction with the intermediary is aimed at transforming or overcoming the minor's will in favor of engaging in illegal sexual activity
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether — pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — communications with an adult intermediary to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor are punishable only if “the defendant’s interaction with the intermediary is aimed at transforming or overcoming the minoyr’s will in favor of engaging in illegal sexual activity.” il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii C.
2020-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-13
Reply of petitioner Dayton Michael Cramer filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-01
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-03-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 4, 2020.
2020-03-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 3, 2020 to May 4, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2020)
2019-12-05
Application (19A630) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 1, 2020.
2019-12-03
Application (19A630) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 1, 2020 to March 1, 2020, submitted to Justice Thomas.