No. 19-1112
Stephanie Jones v. Jeremy Eder, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights fourth-amendment interstate-commerce-clause preemption prescription-drugs prescription-medication probable-cause search-and-seizure supremacy-clause warrantless-seizure
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Fourth Amendment, the Supremacy Clause, or the Interstate Commerce Clause prohibit state actors from warrantlessly seizing the People and their lawfully prescribed and possessed prescription medications inside their own homes based on 'possession alone'?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Fourth Amendment, the Supremacy Clause, or the Interstate Commerce Clause prohibit state actors from warrantlessly seizing the People and their lawfully prescribed and possessed prescription medications inside their own homes based on “possession alone”?
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-29
Reply of petitioner Stephanie Jones filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-09
Brief of respondents Fort Bend County, Josh Dale, and Bryan Baker in opposition filed.
2020-03-13
Waiver of right of respondent Jeremy Eder and Raymond Ng to respond filed.
2020-03-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 9, 2020)
Attorneys
Fort Bend County, Josh Dale, and Bryan Baker
Justin Carl Pfeiffer — Fort Bend County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Justin Carl Pfeiffer — Fort Bend County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Jeremy Eder and Raymond Ng
William S. Helfand — Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, Respondent
William S. Helfand — Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, Respondent
Stephanie Jones
William Pieratt Demond — Demond Law, PLLC, Petitioner
William Pieratt Demond — Demond Law, PLLC, Petitioner