Whether the courts should overrule the decision of the District Court of Connecticut

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the courts should overrule the decision of the District Court of Connecticut (11-cv-904 (CSH)), which granted the Respondents’ motion to dismiss the action. This decision violates the black letter law in the decision Plaut v. Spendthrift Farms, 514 US. 211 (1995) and U.S. Government v. Espinosa, March 238, 2010. 2. Whether the court should question the constitutionality of the Government resorting to “Self-Help” in order to do an “end run” around a prior court ruling. 3. Whether the U.S. Government should be allowed to make an unlawful seizure of money and property without due process. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit No. 18-3488 Peter R. Rumbin, v. Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education, U.S. Dept. of Education, Et Al. Date of Final Opinon: July 8, 2019 Date of Reconsideration Denial: September 3, 2019 United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-904 (CSH) Peter R. Rumbin v. Arne Duncan, Et Al Date of Order: November 1, 2018