Whether a prosecutor violates Doyle v. Ohio by eliciting the fact that an exculpatory story is being told for the 'first time' at trial

QUESTION PRESENTED When a criminal defendant has been advised prior to trial of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 346 (1966), and then testifies at trial to an exculpatory version of events involving an act of uncharged misconduct, does a prosecutor violate Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976) by eliciting the fact that the exculpatory story is being told for the “first time” at trial, by asking, “That’s the first time that we’re hearing this. Isn’t that correct?”; “And this is the first time that we're hearing that information?” (i)