Is TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 42A.755(e) unconstitutional, as applied?

Questions Presented Denial of Access (on Appeal) l.a_ (New) Is TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 42A.755(e) unconstitutional, as applied? : 1.b (New) Are TEX.RS.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d) ; unconstitutional, facially or as applied? 2. Is 3d.CoA abusing discretion by stalling? : ae 8. Is 3d.CoA abusing discretion by not treating ; LIPSCOMBE as recused? 4. Is TEX. TRANSP. CODE unconstitutional, as ‘ applied? : / . Parties to Mandamus Proceeding Below : Petitioner ; WES PERKINS pro se : Respondents * COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD ; DISTRICT OF TEXAS (Rose, C.J., Triana, Smith) , : + COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TRAVIS COUNTY, JUDGE JOHN LIPSCOMBE (“CCL3”) > ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE FOR THE TRAVIS ; COUNTY COURTS AT LAW, JUDGE BILLY RAY STUBBLEFIELD ; + STATE OF TEXAS No appearance of counsel made/needed. : DAVID A. ESCAMILLA TRAVIS COUNTY ATTORNEY P.O. Box 1748 Austin, TX 78767-1748 ; , ii ; Directly