No. 19-1148
Michael Bruno, as Parent, Guardian, and Next Friend of R. B., a Minor, et al. v. Northside Independent School District
Amici (1)
Tags: comparable-services due-process educational-programming educational-services free-appropriate-public-education individuals-with-disabilities-education-act programming school-district special-education-programming student-transfer transfer-student
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-05-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a reduction in a student's programming from a full-day to a half-day program is consistent with the mandate to provide 'similar' or 'equivalent' services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is whether such a reduction is consistent with the mandate that the school district provide “similar” or “equivalent” services, as set forth in guidance from the U.S. Education Department.
Docket Entries
2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-17
Brief of respondent Northside Independent School District in opposition filed.
2020-04-17
Brief amici curiae of Duke Children's Law Clinic et al. filed.
2020-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Children's Law Clinic et al.
Jane Roney Wettach — Duke Law School, Amicus
Jane Roney Wettach — Duke Law School, Amicus
Michael Bruno
Andrew Kiernan Cuddy — Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Petitioner
Andrew Kiernan Cuddy — Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Petitioner
Northside Independent School District
Stacy Adoree Tuer Castillo — Walsh, Gallegos, et al., Respondent
Stacy Adoree Tuer Castillo — Walsh, Gallegos, et al., Respondent