No. 19-1150

Gary Kirchhoff v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-violations due-process federal-suit fifth-amendment first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech military-medical-privileges statute-of-limitations whistleblower whistleblower-rights
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court erred in affirming the lower court's decision that the statute of limitations was past for Gary Kirchhoff, M.D. to file a federal suit claiming that his rights were violated under 42 U.S.C.@1983 and the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented For Review : 1. Whether the court erred in affirming the lower court’s decision that the statute of limitations .o was past for Gary Kirchhoff, M.D. to file a federal suit claiming that his rights were violated under 42 U.S.C.@1983 and the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 2. Whether the United States military can revoke a doctor’s medical privileges forever . because he was a whistleblower. i

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-03-23
Waiver of right of respondents William S. Arimony and the Law Offices of William S. Arimony to respond filed.
2020-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 20, 2020)

Attorneys

Gary Kirchhoff
Gary Kirchhoff — Petitioner
Gary Kirchhoff — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
William S. Arimony and the Law Offices of William S. Arimony
Andrew S. GerrishFrith, Anderson & Peake, PC, Respondent
Andrew S. GerrishFrith, Anderson & Peake, PC, Respondent