No. 19-1167

Bradley William Kennedy v. Stephen Morris, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-24
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: 14th-amendment 8th-amendment AEDPA anti-terrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act anti-terrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act-of- cruel-and-unusual-punishment cumulative-trial-errors due-process habeas-corpus insufficient-evidence statute-of-limitations trial-errors
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-05-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Bradley Kennedy's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is time barred under the one-year statute of limitations set forth in the anti-terrorism & effective death penalty act of 1996

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Bradley Kennedy’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is time barred under the one-year statute of limitations set forth in the anti-terrorism & effective death penalty act of 1996 ““AEDPA”)? 2. Whether Bradley Kennedy is entitled to relief pursuant to the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment because he was convicted without any plausible evidence of a critical element of the crime, and because of inadmissible prejudicial evidence? 3. Whether the cumulative effect of various trial errors so infected Bradley Kennedy’s Trial with unfairness as to make his conviction a denial of Due Process? 4. Whether Bradley Kennedy’s sentence violations the 8th Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment? ii .

Docket Entries

2020-05-26
Petition DENIED.
2020-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-04-13
Letter from counsel for petitioner filed.
2020-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Bradley Kennedy
Anders V. RosenquistLaw Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner
Anders V. RosenquistLaw Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner