No. 19-1168

Mirek Machala v. Libuse Kral, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2020-03-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment judicial-discretion procedural-due-process standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner's due process right was violated

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Petitioner's due process right was violated when the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied his petition for rehearing within _ no time and without providing any reasons for such denial? , 2. Whether a denial of due process which does not amend any generally applicable substantive or procedural laws, but deprives Petitioner of the right to pursue his pending lawsuit, violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? 3. Whether summary judgment was reached in violation of the requirements of procedural due ~ process? 4, Whether judgment rendered in violation of the due process is void in the District of Columbia? 5. Whether Petitioner was denied equal protection of law and due process of law when the trial court repeatedly denied Petitioner’s due process, including motions to compel discovery, without any evidence of surprise or prejudice to opposite parties? 6. Whether D.C. Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinion and Judgment are not supported by substantial evidence in the record, is not in accordance to the law, and an abuse of . discretion?

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-07
Waiver of right of respondent Libuse Kral to respond filed.
2020-04-06
Waiver of right of respondent Nicholas Brown to respond filed.
2020-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 24, 2020)

Attorneys

Libuse Kral
Nathan John BreseeJackson & Campbell, P.C., Respondent
Mirek Machala
Mirek Machala — Petitioner
Nicholas Brown
Craig M. PalikMcNamee Hosea Jernigan Kim Greenan & Lynch, Respondent