No. 19-1188
Samaca, LLC v. Cellairis Franchise, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: arbitrability civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-arbitration-act georgia litigation preemption sanctions standing state-law
Key Terms:
Arbitration DueProcess
Arbitration DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Georgia's remedy for abusive litigation under O.C.G.A. § 9-15-14 exempt from arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is Georgia’s remedy for abusive litigation under 0.C.G.A. § 9-15-14 exempt from arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act ?
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-17
Waiver of right of respondents Cellairis Franchise, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2020-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 29, 2020)
Attorneys
Cellairis Franchise, Inc., et al.
Ronald T. Coleman Jr. — Parker Hudson Rainer & Dobbs, LLP, Respondent
Ronald T. Coleman Jr. — Parker Hudson Rainer & Dobbs, LLP, Respondent
Samaca LLC
David Ramon Martin — D.R. Martin, LLC, Petitioner
David Ramon Martin — D.R. Martin, LLC, Petitioner