No. 19-1195
Adalberto Frickson Palacios-Solis v. United States
Tags: case-in-chief criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-of-guilt fifth-amendment miranda miranda-rights pre-miranda-silence self-incrimination
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
FifthAmendment FourthAmendment DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the prosecution violates the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause when it uses a criminal defendant's post-arrest, pre-Miranda silence as evidence of guilt in its case-in-chief
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the prosecution violates the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause when it uses a criminal defendant’s post-arrest, pre-Miranda silence as evidence of guilt in its case-in-chief.
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-10
Reply of petitioner Adalberto Palacios-Solis filed. (Distributed)
2020-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 8, 2020.
2020-05-29
Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.
2020-05-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 3, 2020 to June 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-05-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 3, 2020.
2020-05-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 4, 2020 to June 3, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Adalberto Palacios-Solis
Vincent Gregory Levy — Holwell Shuster & Goldberg, LLP, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent